Tuesday, July 24, 2012

California Q2 Foreclosure Activity Lowest in Five Years

DQNews - Foreclosures Press Release


California Q2 Foreclosure Activity Lowest in Five Years

July 23, 2012

La Jolla, CA.--The number of California homes entering the formal foreclosure process dropped in the second quarter to its lowest level since early 2007. The decline stems from a combination of factors, including an improving housing market, the gradual burning off of the most egregious mortgages originated from 2005 through 2007, and the growing use of short sales, a real estate information service reported.
A total of 54,615 Notices of Default (NODs) were recorded on houses and condos during the April-though-June period. That was down 2.9 percent from 56,258 for the prior three months, and down 3.6 percent from 56,633 in second-quarter 2011, according to San Diego-based DataQuick.
Last quarter's 54,615 was the lowest since 53,943 NODs were recorded in second-quarter 2007. NODs peaked in first-quarter 2009 at 135,431. DataQuick's NOD statistics go back to 1992. The year-over-year drop was most noticeable in the Bay Area, where the 8,572 NOD filings marked a 13.4 percent drop from 9,893 a year ago.
"The foreclosure process has always been the sanitation department of the housing sector. It's where financial distress is processed. The question is whether these lower NOD numbers mean that there's less distress to process, or if we're just seeing distress get processed at a slower pace," said John Walsh, DataQuick president.
"Obviously the economy has been on the mend - however slowly. But because housing is widely seen by economists as the biggest drag on growth, some interesting alternatives to the foreclosure process are being discussed, such as the use of eminent domain to buy and restructure mortgages. Needless to say, we're all watching closely," he said.
The most active "beneficiaries" in the formal foreclosure process last quarter were Bank of America (8,299), JP Morgan (7,497), Wells Fargo (7,131), Aurora Bank (1,984) and Bank of New York (1,838).
The trustees who pursued the highest number of defaults last quarter were ReconTrust Co (mostly for Bank of America and Bank of New York), Quality Loan Service Corp (Bank of America), Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp (Wells Fargo) and NDEx West (Wells Fargo).
Most of the loans going into default are still from the 2005-2007 period. The median origination quarter for defaulted loans is still third-quarter 2006. That has been the case for three years, indicating that weak underwriting standards peaked then.
NOD filings continued to fall last quarter in communities across the home price spectrum. However, mortgage defaults remained far more concentrated in California's most affordable neighborhoods. Zip codes with second-quarter 2012 median sale prices below $200,000 collectively saw nearly 9 NODs filed for every 1,000 homes in those zip codes, while the ratio was 5.6 NODs filed per 1,000 homes for zip codes with $200,000 to $800,000 medians. For the group of zip codes with median sale prices above $800,000, there were 2.2 NODs filed per 1,000 homes.
On primary mortgages, California homeowners were a median eight months behind on their payments when the lender filed the Notice of Default. The borrowers owed a median $17,864 on a median $317,019 mortgage.
On home equity loans and lines of credit in default, borrowers owed a median $5,227 on a median $75,369 second mortgage. The amount of the credit line that was actually in use cannot be determined from public records.
San Diego-based DataQuick monitors real estate activity nationwide and provides information to consumers, educational institutions, public agencies, lending institutions, title companies and industry analysts. Notices of Default are recorded at county recorders offices and mark the first step of the formal foreclosure process.
Although 54,615 default notices were filed last quarter, they involved 53,664 homes because some borrowers were in default on multiple loans (e.g. a primary mortgage and a line of credit).
Of the state's larger counties, mortgages were least likely to go into default in San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo counties. The probability was highest in Tulare, San Joaquin and Sacramento counties.
Trustees Deeds recorded (TDs), or the finalized loss of a home to the formal foreclosure process, totaled 21,851 during the second quarter. That was down 27.8 percent from 30,261 for the prior quarter, and down 48.5 percent from 42,465 for second-quarter 2011.
Last quarter's Trustees Deeds total was the lowest for any quarter since the second quarter of 2007, when 17,458 were filed.
The all-time peak for Trustees Deeds was 79,511 in third-quarter 2008. The state's all-time low was 637 in the second quarter of 2005, DataQuick reported.
Just as with NOD filings, Trustees Deeds, or foreclosures, remained far more concentrated in the state's most affordable neighborhoods. Zip codes with second-quarter 2012 median sale prices below $200,000 collectively saw 4.3 homes foreclosed on for every 1,000 homes in existence. That compares with 1.9 foreclosures per 1,000 homes for zip codes with medians between $200,000 and $800,000, and less than one - 0.5 - foreclosure per 1,000 homes in the group of zip codes with $800,000-plus medians.
While 1.45 million of California's roughly 8.7 million houses and condos have been involved in a foreclosure proceeding the past five years, 835,000 went through the whole foreclosure process. The other 615,000 were either sold, or the payments were brought current.
Foreclosure resales accounted for 27.9 percent of all California resale activity last quarter, down from a revised 33.6 percent the prior quarter and 35.6 percent a year ago. It peaked at 57.8 percent in the first quarter of 2009. Foreclosure resales varied significantly by county last quarter, from 7.3 percent in San Francisco County to 47.4 percent in Madera County.
Short sales - transactions where the sale price fell short of what was owed on the property - made up an estimated 18.0 percent of statewide resale activity last quarter. That was down from an estimated 20.1 percent the prior quarter and up from 17.4 percent a year earlier. In terms of the number of short sales, last quarter's estimated 20,141 was up 13.0 percent from the prior quarter and up 10.2 percent from a year earlier.
On average, homes foreclosed on last quarter took 7.7 months to wind their way through the formal foreclosure process, beginning with an NOD. That's down from an average of 8.5 months the prior quarter and down from 10.0 months a year earlier.
At formal foreclosure auctions held statewide last quarter, an estimated 40.1 percent of the foreclosed properties were bought by investors or others who don't appear to be lender or government entities. That was up from an estimated 33.4 percent the previous quarter and up from 28.3 percent a year earlier, DataQuick reported.
Notices of Default (Trustees Deeds further down)
houses and condos
County/Region             2011Q2       2012Q2       Yr/Yr%
    
Los Angeles               11,250       10,568        -6.1%
Orange                      3,705        3,599        -2.9%
San Diego                   4,158        4,099        -1.4%
Riverside                   5,534        5,677         2.6%
San Bernardino              4,334        4,487         3.5%
Ventura                     1,133        1,152         1.7%
Imperial                      270          250        -7.4%
Socal                     30,384       29,832        -1.8%
    
San Francisco                 402          295       -26.6%
Alameda                     2,030        1,789       -11.9%
Contra Costa                2,552        2,214       -13.2%
Santa Clara                 1,793        1,474       -17.8%
San Mateo                     732          613       -16.3%
Marin                         279          220       -21.1%
Solano                      1,185        1,137        -4.1%
Sonoma                        738          680        -7.9%
Napa                          182          150       -17.6%
Bay Area                    9,893        8,572       -13.4%
    
Santa Cruz                    245          258         5.3%
Santa Barbara                 487          442        -9.2%
San Luis Obispo               345          313        -9.3%
Monterey                      489          443        -9.4%
Coast                      1,566        1,456        -7.0%
    
Sacramento                  3,397        3,202        -5.7%
San Joaquin                 1,675        1,580        -5.7%
Placer                        849          788        -7.2%
Kern                        1,485        1,508         1.5%
Fresno                      1,612        1,637         1.6%
Madera                        284          279        -1.8%
Merced                        510          483        -5.3%
Tulare                        714          831        16.4%
Yolo                          201          222        10.4%
El Dorado                     377          289       -23.3%
Stanislaus                  1,094        1,133         3.6%
Kings                         184          230        25.0%
San Benito                     85          105        23.5%
Yuba                          195          157       -19.5%
Colusa                         35           44        25.7%
Sutter                        217          175       -19.4%
Central Valley            12,914       12,663        -1.9%
    
Mountains*                    635          648         2.0%
    
North Calif*                1,241        1,444        16.4%
    
Statewide*                56,633       54,615        -3.6%
 includes additional counties
Trustees Deeds Recorded (number of homes foreclosed on)
houses and condos
County/Region             2011Q2     2012Q2    Yr/Yr%
    
Los Angeles                6,733       3,553      -47.2%
Orange                     1,887       1,052      -44.3%
San Diego                  2,763       1,391      -49.7%
Riverside                  4,810       2,395      -50.2%
San Bernardino             4,083       2,012      -50.7%
Ventura                      697         360      -48.4%
Imperial                     274         147      -46.4%
Socal                     21,247      10,910      -48.7%
    
San Francisco                156         103      -34.0%
Alameda                    1,317         638      -51.6%
Contra Costa               1,799         900      -50.0%
Santa Clara                  991         392      -60.4%
San Mateo                    328         182      -44.5%
Marin                        130          74      -43.1%
Solano                       916         475      -48.1%
Sonoma                       495         258      -47.9%
Napa                         129          61      -52.7%
Bay Area                   6,261       3,083      -50.8%
    
Santa Cruz                   191          84      -56.0%
Santa Barbara                319         185      -42.0%
San Luis Obispo              270         107      -60.4%
Monterey                     425         167      -60.7%
Coast                      1,205         543      -54.9%
    
Sacramento                 3,160       1,562      -50.6%
San Joaquin                1,399         729      -47.9%
Placer                       641         320      -50.1%
Kern                       1,555         802      -48.4%
Fresno                     1,392         780      -44.0%
Madera                       298         151      -49.3%
Merced                       585         230      -60.7%
Tulare                       607         408      -32.8%
Yolo                         231         110      -52.4%
El Dorado                    393         149      -62.1%
Stanislaus                 1,199         533      -55.5%
Kings                        157         118      -24.8%
San Benito                    73          47      -35.6%
Yuba                         184          91      -50.5%
Colusa                        40          17      -57.5%
Sutter                       160         113      -29.4%
Central Valley            12,074       6,160      -49.0%
    
Mountains*                   525         358      -31.8%
    
North Calif*               1,153         797      -30.9%
    
Statewide*                42,465      21,851      -48.5%
* includes additional counties
Source: DataQuick; DQNews.com
Media calls: Andrew LePage (916) 456-7157
Copyright 2012 DataQuick. All rights reserved.

Bakersfield makes the top 10 metros for year-over-year percentage increase in median home values...

Daily Real Estate News


DAILY REAL ESTATE NEWS

Produced by Inman News

July 24, 2012

Sponsored by Lowe's

Zillow calls bottom for home values

Index based on 'Zestimates' shows first year-over-year quarterly gain since 2005

Inman News®
By INMAN NEWS
Share This
U.S. home values eked out their first year-over-year quarterly gain in five years during the second quarter of 2007, according to a report released today by online real estate marketplace Zillow.
Zillow's second quarter real estate market report showed median home values up 0.2 percent at the end of June compared to a year ago, to $149,300. The report also showed median home values have posted four consecutive months of year-over-year gains.
"After four months with rising home values and increasingly positive forecast data, it seems clear that the country has hit a bottom in home values," said Zillow Chief Economist Stan Humphries in a statement.
The Phoenix metro continued its leadership among U.S. metros with a 12.1 percent year-over-year median home value increase to $136,200 in the quarter anding June 30.
The Fort Myers, Fla., metro area took the second place spot with a 7.9 percent median home value increase for the quarter from last year to $136,000.
The Green Bay, Wisc., metro area, with a 6.6 percent jump in median home values to $131,700, rounded out the top three.
Among the top 10 metros for annual price gains, all but one -- Denver, at $211,300 -- had index values well below the June U.S. median existing-home price of $189,400, as reported by the National Association of REALTORS® earlier this month. The Zillow Home Value Index average for all 10 was $130,090.
Of the 167 metros Zillow tracks, 53 showed increases in estimated median home values from the second quarter of 2011.
The Zillow Home Value Index is built from automated valuation estimates ("Zestimates") generated by Zillow for single-family residences, condominiums and cooperatives, regardless of whether they sold within a given period. At the national level, the Zillow Home Value Index reflects the median Zestimate of all homes in the U.S. expressed in dollars.
The Zillow Rent Index, launched in March and an additional component of Zillow's real estate market report, shows a U.S.-wide 5.2 percent year-over-year increase to $1,276 from a year ago.
See the top 10 metros for year-over-year percentage median home value increase below.

Location: Phoenix



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$136,200
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)12.1%
Zillow Rent Index$1,148
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)0.3%

Chase Field in Phoenix via Doug James/Shutterstock


Location: Fort Myers



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$136,000
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)7.9%
Zillow Rent Index$1,220
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)7.7%

Fort Myers Beach in Fort Myers, Fla., via Shutterstock


Location: Green Bay, Wisc.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$131,700
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)6.6%
Zillow Rent IndexN/A
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)N/A

Downtown Green Bay, Wisc., image via Flickr/Chad Davis


Location: Miami



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$148,300
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)6.4%
Zillow Rent IndexN/A
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)N/A

Miami Beach and luxury apartments image in Miami via Shutterstock


Location: Tulsa, Okla.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$102,300
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)5.7%
Zillow Rent Index$936
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)3.5%

Downtown Tulsa, Okla., via Flickr/熊.陈美芬.Phan Ly Photography.On/Off


Location: Punta Gorda, Fla.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$118,800
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)4.5%
Zillow Rent Index$1,056
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)8.8%

Punta Gorda, Fla., train station via Flickr/M. Keefe


Location: Anderson, S.C.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$89,400
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)4.1%
Zillow Rent Index$832
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)-3.9%

Tour de la France in Anderson, S.C., image via Flickr/Team Traveller


Location: Grand Rapids, Mich.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$108,000
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)3.7%
Zillow Rent Index$1,145
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)-6.0%

View of downtown Grand Rapids, Mich., via Shutterstock


Location: Denver



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$211,300
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)3.5%
Zillow Rent Index$1,495
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)5.4%

Moonrise, downtown Denver via Shutterstock


Location: Bakersfield, Calif.



Zillow Home Value Index (Q2 2012)$118,900
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)3.4%
Zillow Rent Index$1,252
Percent change (Q2 2011 to Q2 2012)8.9%

Amtrak station in Bakersfield, Calif., with trains via Richard Thornton/Shutterstock
Inman News reporter Paul Hagey compiled this report.

Monday, July 23, 2012

19 Metros That Will Hit 1 Million By 2042 - Neighborhoods - The Atlantic Cities

19 Metros That Will Hit 1 Million By 2042 - Neighborhoods - The Atlantic Cities


19 Metros That Will Hit 1 Million By 2042

19 Metros That Will Hit 1 Million By 2042
Shutterstock
Over the next 30 years, 19 metropolitan areas in America will pass the one million population threshold, according to a new report [PDF] from IHS Global Insight for the U.S. Conference of Mayors. By 2042, 70 metros will be members of the million-plus club. These will account for nearly 213 million people in 2042, more than half of the Census Bureau's estimated 2040 population [PDF] of roughly 392 million.
Here's a list, ranked by the percent of growth they're expected to hit in the next three decades.
Metropolitan Area2012 Population2042 PopulationPercentage Change 2012-2042
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Florida641,7001,305,000103.4%
Provo-Orem, Utah553,3001,096,30098.1%
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas819,6001,609,20096.3%
Boise City-Nampa, Idaho639,3001,139,40078.2%
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, Florida716,7001,159,00061.7%
Stockton, California706,5001,077,20052.5
Bakersfield-Delano, California863,7001,296,20050.1%
Colorado Springs, Colorado647,1001,007,10049.4%
Tucson, Arizona998,9001,474,80047.6%
Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, South Carolina698,2001,014,30045.3%
Albuquerque, New Mexico909,4001,300,10043%
Knoxville, Tennessee711,0001,012,70042.4%
El Paso, Texas839,5001,181,80040.8%
Columbia, South Carolina786,6001,105,30040.5%
Fresno, California955,2001,311,60037.3%
Omaha, Nebraska-Council Bluffs, Iowa888,0001,167,40031.5%
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, California840,1001,098,00030.7%
Tulsa, Oklahoma956,6001,249,80030.6%
Honolulu, Hawaii973,3001,167,40020%

Photo credit: Christian Mueller /Shutterstock
Nate Berg is staff writer at The Atlantic Cities. He lives in Los Angeles. All posts »

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Foreclosure inventory continues to decline in California

Central Valley Business Times

Foreclosure inventory continues to decline in California 

DISCOVERY BAY 
July 11, 2012 4:46pm
  Comment  Email

•  But not everywhere in the Central Valley
•  ‘Negative equity, not foreclosures, are the problem’

The number of homes in California sold through foreclosures in June dropped by 13.4 percent from May. And when compared to a year earlier, the courthouse steps sales were down 48.8 percent, according to a new report from ForeclosureRadar Inc., a Discovery Bay-based foreclosure information company.
In addition, initial foreclosure filings were basically flat, being down 0.93 percent over May and down 3.14 percent from June 2011.
That wasn’t the case in many parts of the epicenter of the nation’s mortgage meltdown – the Central Valley.
Here are ForeclosureRadar’s figures for Central Valley initial filings in June, with the raw number first followed by the percentage difference from May and then the percentage change from June 2011:
• Butte County: 68; -46.46 percent; -46.88 percent
• Fresno County: 578; -4.78 percent; +3.21 percent
• Kern County: 547; -17.25 percent; -5.36 percent
• Kings County: 127; -24.40 percent; +6.72 percent
• Madera County: 68; -31.31 percent; -20.93 percent
• Merced County: 154; -12.00 percent; +3.36 percent
• Sacramento: 1,148; -6.36 percent; -5.12 percent
• San Joaquin: 577; -2.37 percent; +9.49 percent
• Stanislaus: 404; -4.04 percent; -0.49 percent
• Tulare: 322; +1.58 percent; +18.38 percent
• Yolo: 87; +10.13 percent; +10.13 percent
• Yuba: 66; +17.86 percent; -13.16 percent
“We already have significantly low home sales in the market today, and with the declining level of foreclosure sales, the inventory will continue to decrease,” says the report. In California, banks take on average 272 days to resell properties they take back at auction, thus, Realtors, investors, and homebuyers should brace themselves for significantly less inventory in next years' selling season, it says.
"Today California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law the Homeowner Bill of Rights, an anti-foreclosure package which naively thinks that slowing foreclosures will benefit homeowners and the economy by leaving those owners stuck in their prison of debt,” says Sean O'Toole, founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar.
“We've long said negative equity, not foreclosures, are the problem, and this bill, like almost all government efforts to date, does nothing to truly help underwater borrowers. Fortunately this bill was watered down significantly from its original form, so we don't expect it will have the same impact that we've seen from more aggressive legislation in Nevada," he says.
Additionally any impact on foreclosures sales, or REO resales, is more than a year a way based on current foreclosure timeframes. Mr. O’Toole says.
“The most ironic part of this bill’s passage is that foreclosures have already plummeted, and that the real housing crisis in now a lack of homes available for sale. Next spring, we expect there will be half as many REO's available for sale in California, significantly impacting overall home sales and hurting homebuyers, investors, real estate related services and the economy," he says.

Friday, July 6, 2012

On track! California Senate approves high-speed rail

Central Valley Business Times

SACRAMENTO 
July 6, 2012 3:57pm
•  Votes in favor of releasing building funds
•  ‘Let us do what is right’

The California state Senate Friday afternoon approved the releasing of state bond money to begin construction of the nation’s first high-speed passenger train system.
The vote was 21-16. Approval required 21 votes.
The state Assembly had approved releasing the $2.7 billion earlier this week.
The state money will be combined with a $3.3 billion federal grant to begin building a 130-mile segment of the system, from near Madera to near Bakersfield, in the Central Valley later this year.
Fresno Democrat Michael Rubio, through whose district the first segment would be built, voted in favor of releasing the money even though he said he was aware of the opposition of farmers and ranchers. “We cannot jeopardize the industry that feeds this state and the world,” he said in comments on the floor leading up to the vote. But he said he had been assured that the eventual route of the tracks would be such as any taking of farmland would be mitigated.
Mr. Rubio cited the action of Abraham Lincoln, who pushed for a transcontinental railroad at a time when the nation was near bankruptcy and ripped by civil war.
“Let us do what is right,” he urged.
“Four years after the passage of a voter approved initiative, the people expect us to get going,” said Sen. Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, the Senate’s president pro tem.
“What happened to our bipartisan commitment to putting men and women in hard hats back to work?” he said, referring to Friday’s report that the nation added just 80,000 jobs in June.
“What is difficult in the present often becomes the symbol of pride” to future generations, he said.
But critics targeted the location of the first construction contending that it would be a segment of track with little value until it was connected south to Los Angeles and north of San Francisco. Sen. Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, who said he supports high-speed rail, h e cannot support the current plan, which he termed as building “a stranded asset” in the Central Valley.
“Ridership kept slipping. The date kept being pushed back. The ticket prices kept increasing. The private sector would not join in to fund the plan,” said Sen. Jean Fuller, R-Bakersfield, who joined with all other Republicans in voting against the release of the money.
“It is a giant jigsaw puzzle with pieces strewn over the table,” she said.
California voters in 2008 narrowly approved a total of $9 billion in bonds to begin construction of the system. The initial route would link San Francisco and Los Angeles. Eventual expansion would take the system to Sacramento in the north and San Diego in the south.
The trains would hurtle through the Central Valley at speeds of more than 200 miles per hour.